Create a Report

Please provide report title
Please provide location
Please provide details

Get alerts and updates for your case!

This information is not shown on the website. We can notify you of updates, and may contact you for more information to help resolve or follow up on your issue.

Please provide email or phone
Please provide email or phone

We do not show your email or contact info

Skip this step

Add photos or video

We recommend photos and videos to help explain your report

Add Photo/Video
Skip this step

Email or SMS copy of report

Enter below to get emailed a copy of your report, or sms a link to your report

Please provide email or phone
Please provide email or phone

Thank you for your report!


IMPORTANT - Your report is queued
It may take up to 12 hours to process your report.


Email us at support@safelyhq.com if you have questions.

Report by

Please provide location
Please provide location
Please provide report title
Please provide details
Please accept our Terms & Conditions
Get alerts and updates for your case! Your contact information is not shown on the website.

This information is not shown on the website. We can notify you of updates, and may contact you for more information to help resolve or follow up on your issue.

or
Please provide email or phone
Thank you for your report!

IMPORTANT - YOUR REPORT IS QUEUED - IT MAY TAKE UP TO 12 HOURS FOR YOUR REPORT TO SHOW ON OUR HOME PAGE (IF NOT OPTED AS PRIVATE)

Visit our learn pages for more helpful information or, email us: support@safelyhq.com

Goodbye! and best wishes in your recovery

Covid-19 OSHA Complaint, Judson Builders, Inc., 269 West Warner Street, Ventura, CA 93001, USA

2 years ago

Covid-19 OSHA Complaint, Judson Builders, Inc., 269 West Warner Street, Ventura, CA 93001, USA

269 West Warner Street, Ventura, 93001 California, United States

Caller helped with a sewage line installation, caller is a pipe layer. The company is not following safety regulations. No shoring, no hard hat. Been there for 3 months. A buddy of his needed help with there sewer. They called him and fly him down there. Caller worked for 3-4 months. Caller has been a pipe foremen, has all his OSHA training. Got laid off due to covid in WA. Hired by CA company to lay pipes for sewers. People are not trained. No tool box meeting. Guys are being sent down into 17 ft deep. No shoring, no hard hat. The dangers. The sewer lines were live. The more safety issues that were brought up, the more he was pushed out. Boxes were not up to code. Boulders the size of a car. He brought up safety and then was asked to leave. They are sent down into manholes and they have to put ladders down. There are guys in the manhole. Did not have sniffers to detect for gas levels. Not proper confined space. They had an asbestos pipe they were told to cut it. California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5158(d)(5)(A) Employer failed to test, in accordance with subsection (d)(3), shall be conducted with sufficient frequency to ensure that the development of dangerous air contamination, oxygen enrichment and/or oxygen deficiency does not occur during the performance of any operation. Employer is not monitoring for oxygen level. California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5158 (e)(1) Employer failed to ensure Entry Into and Work Within Confined Spaces Safety. The requirements of this subsection apply to entry into and work within a confined space whenever an atmosphere free of dangerous air contamination, oxygen enrichment and/or oxygen deficiency cannot be ensured through the implementation of the applicable provisions of subsection (d), or whenever, due to the existence of an emergency, it is not feasible to ensure the removal of dangerous air contamination, oxygen enrichment and/or an oxygen deficiency through the implementation of the applicable provisions of subsection (d). Employer does not have proper precautions of harnesses. California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1541 (a) Employer failed to ensure safety in surface encumbrances. All surface encumbrances that are located so as to create a hazard to employees shall be removed or supported, as necessary, to safeguard employees. Employer failed to provide shoring on 17 ft deep excavation California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1509 (e) Employer failed to ensure safety by ensuring supervisory employees shall conduct "toolbox" or "tailgate" safety meetings, or equivalent, with their crews at least every 10 working days to emphasize safety. Employer failed to provide safety training every 10 days. California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1514 (d) Employer failed to assure that all required safety devices and safeguards, whether employer or employee provided, including personal protective equipment for the eyes, face, head, hand, foot, and extremities (limbs), protective clothing, respiratory protection, protective shields and barriers, comply with the applicable Title 8 standards and are maintained in a safe, sanitary condition. Employer failed to ensure employee are wearing hard hats.

Alleged Hazards: 5,
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2021-05-03

#coronaviruscovid19 #osha #269westwarnerstreet #ventura #california #us

Recent Interesting Reports

Y

Scammers, Plymouth, Massachusetts, USA

4 days ago reported by user-yztyn577

I order 2 tazer rings for $6.99 each and received 2 cat ear rings, no tazer at all, having been attacked and raped recently I was hoping for some kind of protection, these might hurt if I hit you hard enough, it’s a joke. Ant find then … See More
any more. But I am still looking

I’ve been looking everywhere and googling Tasia range that one ring or company is not showing up anywhere
See Less

#scam #onlineshopping #uspostalservice #onlinescam #delivery #plymouth #massachusetts #us

T
On Feb. 9, 2024, I ordered 2 Inspire My Play Trays from what looked to be a legitimate online shop with an address in Manhattan, KS. There were red flags:
1. At top of webpage, was a Child R - Child Related logo.
2. No phone number … See More
for company on webpage.
3. confirmation email had a no reply sender as: noreplymail @feinschstores. com and a contact email of: stevenbriesing @hotmail. com
4. I had no reply to an inquiry about the order to stevenbriesing @hotmail. com
5. I received an email with a tracking number for Chinese shipping.

I was charged $97.11 by AQR littlemall Mong Kok, HK. I received a package on 3/1/2024 with a pendant necklace having a customs label value of $10. The return "address/phone" on the customs label was: HD GZL 7 Demaozhuang , Daxing District. Beijing, Beijing, Beijing 100000 China Phone: 8618800000000
I filed a dispute with Costo Citibank and sent documentation with the various names from the website, emails, tracking page and shipping label.
I was contacted by Costco Citibank asking for proof of returned item or reason for not returning. I had no way of knowing who to return this item to. I don't speak Mandarin/Chinese so have no way of verifying via phone call the identity of who I'd be talking to and whether they were part of this order.
I found out after the fact, that the Manhattan, Kansas address was a real building, but the Kansas Better Business Bureau had tagged it as being associated with a variety of scam businesses.
Costco Citibank denied my dispute on April 1, 2024, so I am responsible for paying the $97.11 for this pendant that I did not order.
I should have refused the delivery of the package, but it had been delivered to my mailbox.
In my opinion, by accepting the item, this gives credit card companies a way to hold you responsible for the charges. In their dispute forms, you are asked if you received merchandise which puts your dispute in a set customer support decision tree, which may or may not fit your exact situation. Even though they are supposed to "investigate", I have no way of knowing to what extent they investigated if at all

Manhattan Kansas and Hong Kong
See Less

#scam #onlineshopping #delivery #onlinescam #kowloon #hongkong

Last 30 days