Create a Report

Please provide report title
Please provide location
Please provide details

Get alerts and updates for your case!

This information is not shown on the website. We can notify you of updates, and may contact you for more information to help resolve or follow up on your issue.

Please provide email or phone
Please provide email or phone

We do not show your email or contact info

Skip this step

Add photos or video

We recommend photos and videos to help explain your report

Add Photo/Video
Skip this step

Email or SMS copy of report

Enter below to get emailed a copy of your report, or sms a link to your report

Please provide email or phone
Please provide email or phone

Thank you for your report!


IMPORTANT - Your report is queued
It may take up to 12 hours to process your report.


Email us at support@safelyhq.com if you have questions.

Report by

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Updated:

B

Pfizer shot #1 Allergic reaction, Bismarck, ND, USA

3 years ago reported by user-btmqq596

I had the Pfizer shot on 2/25/21. Within 15 minutes of receiving the shot I felt a slight itching sensation between my upper lip and nose. After 45 minutes, my whole face, feet and hands were itching. My hands and feet became red and swollen. My tongue … See More
also started to swell.
I went to the ER and was treated with Prednisone, Pepcid, and Benadryl. After 3 hours I was released with a prescription for Prednisone.
By Saturday morning the same effects were repeating themselves to an increased degree, as well as a hoarseness when I spoke. I went to an urgent care clinic, since the hospital had told me to see my doctor, who wasn’t available on Saturday.
I was put on a combination of Famotidine, Hydroxyzine HCL, and Zyrtec for 7 days. As the swelling and itching have been decreasing, I have been able to reduce the medications.  | Symptoms: Allergic Reaction, Swelling, Itching
See Less

#featuredcovid19vaccinereports #pfizercovid19vaccine #covid19vaccine #vaccine #pfizer #allergicreaction #bismarck #northdakota #us

A
For the employees who are instructed to quarantine due to COVID-19 but are being required to report for work.

Alleged Hazards: 1, Employees Exposed: 6
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2020-11-12

#coronaviruscovid19 #osha #1365tacomaavenue #bismarck #northdakota #us

A
Where employees who are COVID-19 positive or have known constant community close contact exposure are allowed to return to work without a confirmation test result in the neurology clinic.

Alleged Hazards: 1, Employees Exposed: 10
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2020-11-09

#coronaviruscovid19 #osha #900eastbroadwayavenue #bismarck #northdakota #us

A
For employees potentially exposed to COVID-19 infections from employees with confirmed COVID-19 positive test result being allowed to work.

Alleged Hazards: 1, Employees Exposed: 1
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2020-08-03

#coronaviruscovid19 #walmart #osha #2717rockislandplace #bismarck #northdakota #us

A
For employees potentially exposed to COVID-19 infections: 1. Where a hazard assessment has not been performed that accounts for necessary and required personal protective equipment and administrative controls, to include but not limited to gloves, respirators, aprons/suits, and glasses/face shields. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 2. … See More
Where personal protective equipment is not provided or not appropriate for the work environment. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 3. Where sanitation regarding housekeeping, washing facilities, and toilets are not maintained to prevent the spread of infection. (1910.141) at or near 3221 East Rosser Avenue in Bismarck, North Dakota.

Alleged Hazards: 3, Employees Exposed: 10
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2020-10-28
See Less

#coronaviruscovid19 #osha #600south2ndstreet #bismarck #northdakota #us

A
For non medical personnel potentially exposed to COVID-19 infections from patient and other employee interactions: 1. Where a hazard assessment has not been performed that accounts for necessary and required personal protective equipment and administrative controls, to include but not limited to gloves, respirators, aprons/suits, and glasses/face … See More
shields. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 2. Where personal protective equipment is not provided or not appropriate for the work environment. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 3. Where sanitation regarding housekeeping, washing facilities, and toilets are not maintained to prevent the spread of infection. (1910.141)

Alleged Hazards: 3, Employees Exposed: 10
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2020-05-07
See Less

#coronaviruscovid19 #osha #401north9thstreet #bismarck #northdakota #us

A
For employees potentially exposed to COVID-19 infections:

1. Where a hazard assessment has not been performed that accounts for necessary and required personal protective equipment and administrative controls, to include but not limited to gloves, respirators, aprons/suits, and glasses/face shields. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138)

2. … See More
Where the employer did not ensure that employees use personal protective equipment and measures to include face masks, gloves, and social distancing .
(29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138)

3. Where sanitation regarding housekeeping, washing facilities, and toilets are not maintained to prevent the spread of infection. (1910.141)

at or near 3120 North 14th Street in Bismarck, North Dakota.

Alleged Hazards: 3, Employees Exposed: 20
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2020-07-22
See Less

#coronaviruscovid19 #wendys #osha #3120north14thstreet #bismarck #northdakota #us

Last 30 days