Create a Report
Please provide report title
Please provide location
Please provide details
Get alerts and updates for your case! Your contact information is not shown on the website.
This information is not shown on the website. We can notify you of updates, and may contact you for more information to help resolve or follow up on your issue.
Please provide email or phone
Please provide email or phone

We do not show your email or contact info

Please accept our Terms & Conditions
Add photos or video
We recommend photos and videos to help explain your report
Add Photo/Video
Email or SMS copy of report
Enter below to get emailed a copy of your report, or sms a link to your report
Please provide email or phone
Please provide email or phone
Please accept our Terms & Conditions
Thank you for your report!


IMPORTANT - Your report is queued
It may take up to 12 hours to process your report.


Email us at support@safelyhq.com if you have questions.

Report by
Loading...
Please provide location
Please provide location
Please provide report title
Please provide details
Please accept our Terms & Conditions
Get alerts and updates for your case! Your contact information is not shown on the website.

This information is not shown on the website. We can notify you of updates, and may contact you for more information to help resolve or follow up on your issue.

or
Please provide email or phone
Thank you for your report!

IMPORTANT - YOUR REPORT IS QUEUED - IT MAY TAKE UP TO 12 HOURS FOR YOUR REPORT TO SHOW ON OUR HOME PAGE (IF NOT OPTED AS PRIVATE)

Visit our learn pages for more helpful information or, email us: support@safelyhq.com

Goodbye! and best wishes in your recovery

Taco Bell, 1301 S Washington St, Grand Forks, ND 58201, USA

Latest report: May 6, 2020 12:00 PM
#coronaviruscovid19 #tacobell #1301southwashingtonstreet #grandforks #northdakota #unitedstates #fastfood #taco
FK

A pair of fast food workers tested positive for COVID-19

2 years ago

A pair of workers at the Taco Bell in Grand Forks has tested positive for COVID-19. One of the employees worked on April 22nd. If you visited the supermarket during that time, please report it and any other location that you visited.

Source: grandforksherald.com See Less
38


Related Reports

There were as many as 16 outages impacting 7,477 customers, according to the Xcel Energy. A few more outages are affecting Grand Forks and Fargo as well. The cause of the outages is still unknown

Outage link: outagemap-xcelenergy.com
Source: kxnet.com
Published: 2022 04 05 See Less
38


For employees exposed to health hazards without proper personal protective equipment when cleaning rooms where COVID-19 positive individuals have stayed.

Alleged Hazards: 1, Employees Exposed: 2
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2021-01-05 See Less
38


1. For employees potentially exposed to COVID-19 infections where a hazard assessment has not been performed that accounts for necessary and required personal protective equipment and administrative controls, to include but not limited to gloves, respirators, aprons/suits, and glasses/face shields. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 2.... See More For employees potentially exposed to COVID-19 infections where personal protective equipment is not provided or not appropriate for the work environment. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 3. For employees potentially exposed to COVID-19 infections where the employees who test positive with Covid-19 were required to go back to work. 4. For employees potentially exposed to respiratory hazards from mold exposure in the warehouse. [Section (5)(a)(1)]

Alleged Hazards: 4, Employees Exposed: 5
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2020-11-19
See Less
38


For the employees and donors exposed to Covid-19 where the spread of COVID-19 in not controlled by engineering or administrative controls in accordance with current CDC guidelines at or near 4770 Technology Circle in Grand Forks, North Dakota.

Alleged Hazards: 1, Employees Exposed: 34
Source: Osha.gov |... See More Receipt Date: 2020-12-09 See Less
38


For employees potentially exposed to COVID-19 infections: 1. Where a hazard assessment has not been performed that accounts for necessary and required personal protective equipment to include but not limited to gloves, respirators, aprons/suits, and glasses/face shields. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 2. Where personal protective... See More equipment is not provided or not appropriate for the work environment. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 3. Where sanitation regarding housekeeping, washing facilities, and toilets are not maintained to prevent the spread of infection. (1910.141)

Alleged Hazards: 3, Employees Exposed: 15
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2020-03-12
See Less
38


For employees potentially exposed to COVID-19 infections: 1. Where a hazard assessment has not been performed that accounts for necessary and required personal protective equipment and administrative controls, to include but not limited to gloves, respirators, aprons/suits, and glasses/face shields. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 2.... See More Where personal protective equipment is not provided or not appropriate for the work environment. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 3. Where sanitation regarding housekeeping, washing facilities, and toilets are not maintained to prevent the spread of infection. (29 CFR 1910.141) at or near 3750 32nd Avenue South in Grand Forks, North Dakota.

Alleged Hazards: 3, Employees Exposed: 10
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2020-12-07
See Less
38


For employees potentially exposed to COVID-19 infections: 1. Where a hazard assessment has not been performed that accounts for necessary and required personal protective equipment and administrative controls, to include but not limited to gloves, respirators, aprons/suits, and glasses/face shields. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 2.... See More Where personal protective equipment is not provided or not appropriate for the work environment. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138) 3. Where sanitation regarding housekeeping, washing facilities, and toilets are not maintained to prevent the spread of infection. (29 CFR 1910.141) 4. Where employees with confirmed close contact with COVID-19 positive individuals are allowed to work.

Alleged Hazards: 4, Employees Exposed: 30
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2020-10-27
See Less
38


For employees potentially exposed to COVID-19 infections: 1. Where administrative controls have not been developed or implemented to prevent or reduce exposure for gatherings or meetings of personnel. 2. Where a hazard assessment has not been performed that accounts for necessary and required personal protective equipment to... See More include but not limited to gloves, respirators, aprons/suites, and glasses/face shields. (29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.133, 1910.134, 1910.138)

Alleged Hazards: 3, Employees Exposed: 50
Source: Osha.gov | Receipt Date: 2020-03-26
See Less
38


Recent Interesting Reports

I received my package on December 14, 2022 and it was not what I ordered I ordered 3 Dooney & Bourne purses as the Facebook video said it was QVC. These purses are knock offs. There was no information listed in and or on the package verifying... See More the company or how to return the product. The label on the package had “Return Address: Only for Return
12500 Slauson Ave. Unit B1A (Not Seller Address) Sante Fe Springs, CA 90670”

The order was placed on 11/23/2022. After placing the order on what appeared to be QVC it stated order complete. I then received a text saying my credit card had approved a charge for UNIOOS.COM. I had never heard of them and immediately called my credit card company to investigate. After the investigation was complete my credit card company told me that I would need to contact the company to see about returning the products and how to get a refund. I was then given an email address to contact them. I emailed them on 12/26/2922 and I have not heard from them.

I went on their website and it stated that you have 30 days to return the product but they would have to be contacted first before sending the product back. It also stated that the company would email a return label for the return.

As of 01/03/2023 I have not heard from the company. There I looked up the return address listed on the package.

It appears that whoever this company is, they are using QVC information to show the products but once the order is placed it is not QVC.
See Less
9.6K


WC
anonymous9724
This is most exactly what happened to me. except mine were vintage clark boots. What i recieved many weeks later are def. not what I ordered, I have no email addtess no contact information. Very upset.
Reply 3 weeks ago
NI
anonymous10111
Same for me. So frustrating.
Reply 3 weeks ago
IY
anonymous9937
Me as well.
Reply 3 weeks ago
FV
anonymous9971
Happen the same to me
Reply 3 weeks ago
TB
anonymous10223
The same thing happened to me. I ordered this same Dooney & Bourke Cross-grain pebble handbag in elephant gray. A month later I received a brown purse and no engraved label like the image above. #facebookscam
Reply 3 weeks ago
TB
anonymous10226
Also, the email address for requesting return information was not valid. I tried twice and got a delivery failure: Customerservice@mmqvc.com
Reply 3 weeks ago
GM
g.........0
I also ordered the crossbody purses supposedly Dooneys from qvc. You all are so right- total knock offs. I’m concerned if I mail them to the return address in Santa Fe Springs I will never see the purses or my money again! I’m a regular qvc customer. Maybe we should contact them???
Reply 3 weeks ago
DI
d............4
The exact same thing happened to me
Reply 2 weeks ago
TR
anonymous10424
Happen to me and credit card company won't do anything
Reply 2 weeks ago
TD
anonymous10440
Same
Reply 2 weeks ago
WL
w........7
I received a duplicate necklace and I want to return the duplicate item. Unable to find any information to return item and not be charged for it.
.
Reply 6 days ago
Never ordered this stupid thing. I better not be charged for it! from Coppell address and don’t know what the heck it is. It looks like a Doily.

I'm in Ponte Vedra Beach See Less
4.5K


Wrong products. What I ordered didn't arrive, I ordered creams for warts and some pills and gummies arrived to reduce. I'm in Passmore Avenue, Hammonton, New Jersey, USA UU. See Less
7.8K


I received a package from this location twice now. Can't remember what was in the first package but this one today is ear muffs. I live in Alabama and would not even think of purchasing ear muffs. My cards have not been charged or bank account.

I'm in Monroeville See Less
2.3K


JE
J...........0
Keep checking ur cards and bank I was just charged for something I didn't order to
Reply 4 days ago
I ordered over 40 dollars worth of Christmas ornaments and received something that looks like it goes over your legs with a strap on it. Guess I got ripped off big time. No more ordering on line for me. See Less
664


I've received today a package with a hat and neck cover, value 5usds.
I never ordered this... The name in the package is Michael Nick., PFT logistics.
Never heard of them. I did order some Xmas Dec's just before, cost £37.....possibly its this company. The company was... See More Price Beater on Facebook advertising..... Seen the same things still advertised under different names. Beware people.

I'm in Oldham
See Less
650


AT
a...................0
I came here. I'm in Rochdale. I ordered an impulse 'hot buy' on FB too. Think we both have been scammed. I got a soft hat and snood too
Reply 3 weeks ago
Ordered $200 worth of merchandise money was taken from my account 3 days later. Merchandise was to arrive 10 days after. It has been 2 months of fake emails fake tracking numbers. This place is dangerous See Less
1.6K


Last 30 days